Skip to main content

Acupuncture for procedural pain in newborn infants

Authors: Cabano Rita, Al-Abdallat Haneen, Hamamreh Rawan, Soll Greg, Oei Ju Lee, Schmölzer Georg M, Bruschettini MatteoJournal: The Cochrane database of systematic reviewsPublished: April 22, 2025DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015894.pub2
Q1 JournalSJR: 4.8h-index: 291SCImago
Strong EvidenceSystematic Review

In Plain Language

Procedural pain management in newborns, particularly those in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), presents challenges due to limited safe and effective options. Acupuncture, a Traditional Chinese Medicine practice, has emerged as a potential alternative for pain relief in this population. To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial registries up to August 2023. We checked the references of included studies and related systematic reviews. We included parallel and cross-over randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with no treatment or sham treatment; any non-pharmacological treatment; any pharmacological treatment; or one type of acupuncture compared to another type of acupuncture. Our outcomes were: pain scores; harms; parental, family, and caregiver satisfaction with the intervention; use of additional pharmacological intervention for pain relief; episodes of bradycardia/apnea/desaturation; neonatal mortality; mortality during initial hospitalization; intraventricular hemorrhage; late-onset sepsis; duration of hospital stay; major neurodevelopmental disability. We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs. We conducted meta-analyses using fixed-effect models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD, when combining different pain scales) and standard deviation for continuous outcomes. We summarized the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach. We included 11 RCTs enrolling 852 infants. Five studies compared acupuncture to no treatment or sham treatment; four studies to non-pharmacological treatment (oral sucrose or glucose); and two studies compared acupuncture to other types of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatments, which we refer to

Key Findings: what this systematic review found

  • ✓This systematic review evaluated acupuncture as a potential pain management intervention for newborn infants undergoing painful procedures in neonatal intensive care units.
  • ✓The review searched multiple databases including Cochrane Central Register, PubMed, and Embase through August 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture to no treatment, sham treatment, or other pain management approaches.

What This Means for You

While acupuncture is being explored for newborn pain relief, evidence is still emerging and parents should consult with their NICU medical team before considering this option for their infant.

What This Means for Practitioners

This systematic review highlights the need for more rigorous clinical trials in neonatal acupuncture; current practitioners should stay informed about evolving evidence and refer parents to appropriate medical oversight.

Read Full Paper↗

Common questions about this study

What does this study mean in practice?

While acupuncture is being explored for newborn pain relief, evidence is still emerging and parents should consult with their NICU medical team before considering this option for their infant.

What did this study find?

This systematic review evaluated acupuncture as a potential pain management intervention for newborn infants undergoing painful procedures in neonatal intensive care units. The review searched multiple databases including Cochrane Central Register, PubMed, and Embase through August 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture to no treatment, sham treatment, or other pain management approaches.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a systematic review and we rate its evidence strong. It was published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, a Q1 journal. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist