Skip to main content

[Children with ear disorders who are treated by reflexologists or general practitioners]

Authors: Kjøller MetteJournal: Ugeskrift for laegerPublished: May 5, 2003
Moderate EvidenceObservationaln=155 participants

In Plain Language: reflexology, explained

The aim of the study was to describe similarities and differences in health, quality of life, and diagnosed morbidity in 0-6 year-old children whose parents contact either a reflexologist or a general practitioner (GP) due to their child's ear disorder. A total of 98 children who received reflexology treatment and 57 children who received treatment by a GP were included. Reflexologists and GPs described the child's symptoms, the parents completed a questionnaire about health status and ear disorders and a specialist examined and diagnosed the child. The most prevalent symptoms were colds and troubled sleep and the least prevalent were inflammation of the throat and poor spoken language. Parents in the reflexology group considered their children to be more ill than parents in the GP group (measured by number of ear disorders, number of antibiotic treatments, number of sickness days during the past year and the duration of the acute ear disorder). Furthermore, parents in the reflexology group reported that their children had more physical discomfort, more activity limitations and more emotional problems than children treated by GPs and the parents themselves were also more troubled by the ear disorder. The specialist examination showed no differences between the two groups of children, neither according to tympanometry nor according to diagnosis. According to a medical evaluation there was no difference in morbidity between children treated by a reflexologist and a GP. According to the parents' evaluation, children in reflexology treatment were more ill and their health-related quality of life was more affected by the ear disorder than that of children treated by a GP.

Key Findings: what this observational study found

  • ✓Children in the reflexology group had parents who perceived them as more ill than children in the GP group, based on measures including number of ear disorders, antibiotic treatments, sickness days, and duration of acute ear disorders.
  • ✓The most common symptoms reported in both treatment groups were colds and troubled sleep, while inflammation of the throat and poor spoken language were the least prevalent symptoms.
  • ✓The study compared 98 children treated by reflexologists with 57 children treated by general practitioners for ear disorders, using both parental questionnaires and specialist medical examinations for diagnosis.

What This Means for You

If you're considering reflexology for your child's ear disorder, be aware that medical testing showed no difference in actual ear health compared to standard medical care, though parents choosing reflexology reported more perceived symptoms.

What This Means for Practitioners

This study suggests reflexology and conventional GP care show equivalent medical outcomes for pediatric ear disorders, indicating the importance of setting realistic expectations with parents about symptom perception versus clinical findings.

Study Design: how this observational study was run

Sample Size
155 participants
Read Full Paper↗

Common questions about this study

What does this study mean in practice?

If you're considering reflexology for your child's ear disorder, be aware that medical testing showed no difference in actual ear health compared to standard medical care, though parents choosing reflexology reported more perceived symptoms.

What did this study find?

Children in the reflexology group had parents who perceived them as more ill than children in the GP group, based on measures including number of ear disorders, antibiotic treatments, sickness days, and duration of acute ear disorders. The most common symptoms reported in both treatment groups were colds and troubled sleep, while inflammation of the throat and poor spoken language were the least prevalent symptoms. The study compared 98 children treated by reflexologists with 57 children treated by general practitioners for ear disorders, using both parental questionnaires and specialist medical examinations for diagnosis.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a observational study and we rate its evidence moderate. It covers 155 participants. It was published in Ugeskrift for laeger. Reflexology is a complementary therapy, not a replacement for medical treatment.

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist