Complementary and alternative medical therapies in multiple sclerosis--the American Academy of Neurology guidelines: a commentary
In Plain Language
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) is common, but its use has been limited by a lack of evidence-based guidance. In March 2014, the American Academy of Neurology published the most comprehensive literature review and evidence-based practice guidelines for CAM use in MS. The guideline author panel reviewed and classified articles according to the American Academy of Neurology therapeutic scheme, and recommendations were linked to the evidence strength. Level A recommendations were found for oral cannabis extract effectiveness in the short term for spasticity-related symptoms and pain and ineffectiveness of ginkgo biloba for cognitive function improvement in MS. Key level B recommendations included: Oral cannabis extract or a synthetic cannabis constituent, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is probably ineffective for objective spasticity improvement in the short term; Nabiximols oromucosal cannabinoid spray is probably effective for spasticity symptoms, pain, and urinary frequency, but probably ineffective for objective spasticity outcomes and bladder incontinence; Magnetic therapy is probably effective for fatigue reduction in MS; A low-fat diet with fish oil supplementation is probably ineffective for MS-related relapses, disability, fatigue, magnetic resonance imaging lesions, and quality of life. Several Level C recommendations were made. These included possible effectiveness of gingko biloba for fatigue; possible effectiveness of reflexology for MS-related paresthesias; possible ineffectiveness of the Cari Loder regimen for MS-related disability, symptoms, depression, and fatigue; and bee sting therapy for MS relapses, disability, fatigue, magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, and health-related quality of life. Despite the availability of studies evaluating the effects of oral cannabis in MS, the use of these formulations in United States may be limited due to a lack of standardized, commercial US Food and Dr
Key Findings: what this systematic review found
- ✓Oral cannabis extract was found to be effective in the short term for treating spasticity-related symptoms and pain in multiple sclerosis patients.
- ✓Ginkgo biloba was found to be ineffective for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis patients.
- ✓The American Academy of Neurology published comprehensive evidence-based guidelines in March 2014 to provide structured recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine use in multiple sclerosis, addressing a gap in evidence-based guidance.
What This Means for You
If you have MS and are considering complementary therapies, cannabis extract has the strongest evidence for spasticity relief, but talk to your neurologist since most other alternative treatments lack solid scientific support.
What This Means for Practitioners
Reflexologists should be aware that while some CAM therapies have evidence-based support for MS symptoms, reflexology itself is not mentioned in these major neurology guidelines, so client expectations should be carefully managed.
Common questions about this study
What does this study mean in practice?
If you have MS and are considering complementary therapies, cannabis extract has the strongest evidence for spasticity relief, but talk to your neurologist since most other alternative treatments lack solid scientific support.
What did this study find?
Oral cannabis extract was found to be effective in the short term for treating spasticity-related symptoms and pain in multiple sclerosis patients. Ginkgo biloba was found to be ineffective for improving cognitive function in multiple sclerosis patients. The American Academy of Neurology published comprehensive evidence-based guidelines in March 2014 to provide structured recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine use in multiple sclerosis, addressing a gap in evidence-based guidance.
How strong is this evidence?
This is a systematic review and we rate its evidence strong. It was published in Clinical therapeutics. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.
Looking for a reflexologist?
Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.
Find a Reflexologist