Effects of perineal massage during childbirth on maternal and neonatal outcomes in primiparous women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
In Plain Language: pregnancy, explained
A systematic review explored the effects of perineal massage during childbirth on mothers and their newborns. The study found that such massage can help prevent injuries to the perineum and reduce complications during labor, which is significant for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Key Findings: what this meta-analysis found about pregnancy
- ✓Perineal massage during the second stage of labor doubles the incidence of intact perineum (RR = 2.78).
- ✓Reduces second- and third-degree lacerations significantly (P < 0.05).
- ✓Decreases the incidence of episiotomy (RR = 0.63).
What This Means for You
For women considering perineal massage during childbirth, this treatment may significantly reduce the risk of perineal tears and the need for interventions such as episiotomy, making childbirth less traumatic.
What This Means for Practitioners
Reflexology practitioners can inform clients about the benefits of perineal massage during the second stage of labor, as it has been shown to improve perineal outcomes and may enhance their overall childbirth experience.
Study Design: how this meta-analysis was run
Limitations: what it cannot tell you about pregnancy
The study emphasizes the need for high-quality research on the standardized procedure of perineal massage and does not demonstrate significant benefits on neonatal outcomes.
Pregnancy: common questions
What does this study say about pregnancy?
For women considering perineal massage during childbirth, this treatment may significantly reduce the risk of perineal tears and the need for interventions such as episiotomy, making childbirth less traumatic.
What did this study find?
Perineal massage during the second stage of labor doubles the incidence of intact perineum (RR = 2.78). Reduces second- and third-degree lacerations significantly (P < 0.05). Decreases the incidence of episiotomy (RR = 0.63).
How strong is this evidence?
This is a meta-analysis and we rate its evidence strong. It covers 3,248 participants. It was published in International journal of nursing studies, a Q1 journal. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.
What are the limitations of this study?
The study emphasizes the need for high-quality research on the standardized procedure of perineal massage and does not demonstrate significant benefits on neonatal outcomes.
Related Research
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments in lowering blood pressure in pregnant women with hypertension: A systematic review.
Comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions on postpartum maternal sleep quality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
The effect of prenatal yoga and reflexology in reducing labor duration and perceived pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis
Effect of acupressure and reflexology on pregnancy constipation: a quasi-experimental study
The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Postpartum Comfort and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Postpartum Women: A Meta-Analysis Study
Looking for a reflexologist?
Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.
Find a Reflexologist