Skip to main content

General practitioners' assessment of and interest in alternative medicine in Canada

Authors: Verhoef M J, Sutherland L RJournal: Social science & medicine (1982)Published: August 1, 1995
Limited EvidenceCross Sectionaln=200 participants

In Plain Language

Canadian physicians' opinions about alternative medicine have, as yet, not been assessed. The objectives of this pilot study were to assess general practitioners': (1) desired involvement in alternative medicine; (2) perceived demand for alternative medicine; and (3) beliefs about the efficacy of different alternative approaches. The study design was a cross-sectional survey of 400 randomly selected Alberta and Ontario general practitioners. Of the 384 eligible physicians, 200 (52%) completed the questionnaire. Seventy-three percent of physicians felt that they should have some knowledge about the most important alternative treatments. However, with respect to other issues, physicians desired less involvement with alternative medicine. Sixty-five percent perceived a demand for alternative medicine from their patients, in particular chiropractic. Alternative medicine was perceived to be needed most for musculoskeletal problems and chronic pain or illness. Chiropractic, hypnosis and acupuncture (for chronic pain) were believed to be most efficacious, while homeopathy and reflexology were considered to be least efficacious. Undergraduate, graduate clinical and continuing medical education will need to address alternative treatments in order to provide physicians with up-to-date and relevant information.

Key Findings: what this cross-sectional study found

  • ✓Seventy-three percent of Canadian general practitioners felt they should have knowledge about important alternative treatments, though they desired limited overall involvement with alternative medicine.
  • ✓Sixty-five percent of physicians perceived demand from their patients for alternative medicine, with chiropractic being the most commonly requested approach.
  • ✓General practitioners believed alternative medicine was most needed for treating musculoskeletal problems and chronic pain or illness.

What This Means for You

This study suggests that many Canadian doctors remain skeptical about reflexology's effectiveness, so you should not expect strong medical endorsement, though some practitioners may have knowledge of it.

What This Means for Practitioners

Reflexologists should be aware that general practitioners view reflexology as having limited efficacy and may need to focus on building relationships with doctors or conducting stronger research to change these perceptions.

Study Design: how this cross-sectional study was run

Sample Size
200 participants
Read Full Paper↗

Common questions about this study

What does this study mean in practice?

This study suggests that many Canadian doctors remain skeptical about reflexology's effectiveness, so you should not expect strong medical endorsement, though some practitioners may have knowledge of it.

What did this study find?

Seventy-three percent of Canadian general practitioners felt they should have knowledge about important alternative treatments, though they desired limited overall involvement with alternative medicine. Sixty-five percent of physicians perceived demand from their patients for alternative medicine, with chiropractic being the most commonly requested approach. General practitioners believed alternative medicine was most needed for treating musculoskeletal problems and chronic pain or illness.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a cross-sectional study and we rate its evidence limited. It covers 200 participants. It was published in Social science & medicine (1982). This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist