Skip to main content

Complementary cancer care in Southampton: a survey of staff and patients

Authors: Lewith G T, Broomfield J, Prescott PJournal: Complementary therapies in medicinePublished: June 1, 2002
Q2 JournalSJR: 0.7h-index: 88SCImago
Limited EvidenceCross Sectionaln=358 participants

In Plain Language: cancer pain, explained

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is used by one in ten of the UK population yearly and 47% during their lifetime. One-third of cancer patients seek some form of CAM treatment during their illness. To evaluate the use of and attitudes to CAM among patients and all healthcare staff in the Southampton Cancer Care Directorate (UK). The Royal South Hants Hospital, Countess Mountbatten and Oakhaven Hospices. A questionnaire-based survey performed between January 2001 and March 2001. Two hundred and seventy questionnaires were distributed to patients and 162 responses received. The distribution of cancers within this population was generally typical of those in the community. Thirty-two percent (n = 52) were receiving some form of CAM, half of those receiving CAM were in hospice care. Forty-nine percent of those not receiving CAM would like to, and 76% of all patients would be prepared to pay for this treatment. The five most popular treatments were massage, nutrition, aromatherapy, relaxation and reflexology. While most patients expected CAM to palliate their symptoms (n = 149, 92%), some had unrealistic expectations that CAM would cure their cancer (n = 13, 8%). Four hundred and forty-eight staff questionnaires were distributed and 196 responses were received: 148 (75.5%) from nurses. Twenty-one percent of staff responding had CAM training and two-thirds would like to receive training. The most popular therapies used by staff were the same as those identified by the patients. Ninety-nine percent of staff and 98.5% of patients wished to see CAM treatments introduced into service provision within the Cancer Care Directorate. The use of CAM for cancer care in Southampton is widespread and consistent with its use nationally. There is a clearly expressed need for CAM treatments by patients and a willingness to pay. Two-thirds of the cancer care staff responding wished to receive training in and provide these therapies. There are some misconceptions among pati

Key Findings: what this cross-sectional study found about cancer pain

  • ✓One-third of cancer patients seek some form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment during their illness.
  • ✓Among surveyed cancer patients, 32% were receiving some form of CAM, with half of those receiving CAM being in hospice care.
  • ✓Forty-nine percent of cancer patients not currently receiving CAM would like to receive it, and 76% of all patients would be willing to pay for CAM treatment.

What This Means for You

Reflexology is a popular complementary therapy among cancer patients, but this survey shows only attitudes and usage patterns—not whether it actually improves symptoms or outcomes.

What This Means for Practitioners

Cancer patients have strong interest in reflexology and other complementary therapies, with most willing to pay for treatment, presenting a potential patient base, though healthcare staff training and integration remain limited.

Study Design: how this cross-sectional study was run

Sample Size
358 participants
Read Full Paper↗

Cancer pain: common questions

What does this study say about cancer pain?

Reflexology is a popular complementary therapy among cancer patients, but this survey shows only attitudes and usage patterns—not whether it actually improves symptoms or outcomes.

What did this study find?

One-third of cancer patients seek some form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment during their illness. Among surveyed cancer patients, 32% were receiving some form of CAM, with half of those receiving CAM being in hospice care. Forty-nine percent of cancer patients not currently receiving CAM would like to receive it, and 76% of all patients would be willing to pay for CAM treatment.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a cross-sectional study and we rate its evidence limited. It covers 358 participants. It was published in Complementary therapies in medicine, a Q2 journal. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Related Research

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist