Skip to main content

Efficacy of Interventions to Reduce Arteriovenous Fistula Cannulation-Related Pain in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Ozen Nurten, Ersoy Nese Altinok, Kesik GulsahJournal: Journal of renal carePublished: September 1, 2025DOI: 10.1111/jorc.70028
Strong EvidenceSystematic Review

In Plain Language

Experiencing continued pain affects the level of haemodialysis adherence in patients and ultimately decrease quality of life. Therefore, pain control is an important priority in these patients. No systematic review and meta-analyses study about the effect of intervention (invasive and noninvasive intervention) on the arteriovenous fistula cannulation-related pain has yet been carried out. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of intervention to reduce the arteriovenous fistula cannulation-related pain in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Using English databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and EBSCOHOST were systematically searched from their inception to April 2025. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using the JBI RCT checklist. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis® software version 3.0 (Biostat) was used for data analysis. Twenty-two randomised controlled trials examined the effects of interventions to alleviate the arteriovenous fistula cannulation-related pain including invasive and noninvasive interventions related studies. Invasive interventions buttonhole cannulation, using plastic needle and using indwelling needles. Noninvasive methods include cryotherapy or using a local skin cooling device, aromatherapy, foot reflexology, US-guided cannulation, antistress balls, listening to music or running water, virtual reality distraction, breathing exercise, and acupressure on patients with haemodialysis. The study demonstrated that invasive and noninvasive interventions had beneficial effects on the fistula cannulation-related pain. However, due to the heterogeneity and the lack of follow-up studies, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the results of our review and to clarify the long-term effects of interventions.

Key Findings: what this systematic review found

  • ✓Cannulation-related pain significantly affects hemodialysis adherence and quality of life in patients undergoing treatment.
  • ✓This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of both invasive and noninvasive interventions for reducing arteriovenous fistula cannulation-related pain.
  • ✓A comprehensive search across seven major English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and EBSCOHOST) was conducted through April 2025 to identify relevant evidence.

What This Means for You

Foot reflexology is one of several evidence-based options shown to help reduce dialysis needle pain, though its effectiveness compared to other methods needs further research.

What This Means for Practitioners

Include foot reflexology as part of a multimodal pain-reduction strategy for dialysis patients, supported by systematic review evidence, and coordinate with healthcare teams managing patient care.

Read Full Paper↗

Common questions about this study

What does this study mean in practice?

Foot reflexology is one of several evidence-based options shown to help reduce dialysis needle pain, though its effectiveness compared to other methods needs further research.

What did this study find?

Cannulation-related pain significantly affects hemodialysis adherence and quality of life in patients undergoing treatment. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of both invasive and noninvasive interventions for reducing arteriovenous fistula cannulation-related pain. A comprehensive search across seven major English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and EBSCOHOST) was conducted through April 2025 to identify relevant evidence.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a systematic review and we rate its evidence strong. It was published in Journal of renal care. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist