Non-invasive interventions for improving well-being and quality of life in patients with lung cancer
In Plain Language: cancer pain, explained
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death globally. Despite advances in treatment, outlook for the majority of patients remains grim and most face a pessimistic outlook accompanied by sometimes devastating effects on emotional and psychological health. Although chemotherapy is accepted as an effective treatment for advanced lung cancer, the high prevalence of treatment-related side effects as well the symptoms of disease progression highlight the need for high quality palliative and supportive care to minimise symptom distress and to promote quality of life. To assess the effectiveness of non-invasive interventions delivered by healthcare professionals in improving symptoms, psychological functioning and quality of life in patients with lung cancer. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966-March 2003), EMBASE (1974-March 2003), CINAHL (1982-September 2002), CancerLit (1975-October 2002), PsycINFO (1873-March 2003), reference lists of relevant articles and contact with authors. Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of non-invasive interventions in improving well-being and quality of life in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Two reviewers independently assessed relevant studies for inclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment of relevant studies was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Nine trials were included and categorised into six groups. Two trials of a nursing intervention to manage breathlessness showed benefit on symptom experience, performance status and emotional functioning. Three trials assessed structured nursing programmes and found positive effects on delay in clinical deterioration, dependency and symptom distress, and improvements in emotional functioning and satisfaction with care. One trial assessing counselling showed benefit on some emotional components of the illness but findings were not conclusive. One trial
Key Findings: what this systematic review found about cancer pain
- ✓Lung cancer patients experience significant emotional and psychological health effects alongside their medical condition, necessitating comprehensive supportive care approaches.
- ✓Chemotherapy-related side effects and disease progression symptoms are highly prevalent in advanced lung cancer patients, highlighting the need for palliative interventions to reduce symptom distress.
- ✓Non-invasive interventions delivered by healthcare professionals show potential for improving symptoms, psychological functioning, and quality of life in lung cancer patients.
What This Means for You
While this review examines various supportive therapies for lung cancer patients, the evidence for reflexology specifically is not detailed here, so consult your healthcare team about whether complementary therapies might benefit your individual situation.
What This Means for Practitioners
This systematic review establishes that non-invasive interventions delivered by qualified professionals have a role in lung cancer care, providing a foundation to position reflexology as part of a comprehensive supportive care approach when appropriate evidence is available.
Cancer pain: common questions
What does this study say about cancer pain?
While this review examines various supportive therapies for lung cancer patients, the evidence for reflexology specifically is not detailed here, so consult your healthcare team about whether complementary therapies might benefit your individual situation.
What did this study find?
Lung cancer patients experience significant emotional and psychological health effects alongside their medical condition, necessitating comprehensive supportive care approaches. Chemotherapy-related side effects and disease progression symptoms are highly prevalent in advanced lung cancer patients, highlighting the need for palliative interventions to reduce symptom distress. Non-invasive interventions delivered by healthcare professionals show potential for improving symptoms, psychological functioning, and quality of life in lung cancer patients.
How strong is this evidence?
This is a systematic review and we rate its evidence strong. It was published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, a Q1 journal. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.
Related Research
Complementary therapy in practice
Engaging Patients in Research That Involves Meditation: Religious Concerns and Nursing Implications
Improving Quality of Life in The Constipated Older Person: Reflexology or Abdominal Massage? A Two-Group, Randomized Comparative Trial
Mind-Body Interventions for People With Cancer: Evidence, Innovation, and Implementation
Therapeutic Massage for Cancer Survivors: An Umbrella Review
Looking for a reflexologist?
Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.
Find a Reflexologist