Skip to main content

Power Point Therapy: An Effective and Simple Treatment for Subacute Back Pain - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Ofner Michael, Liebhauser Martin, Walach HaraldJournal: Complementary medicine researchPublished: January 1, 2019DOI: 10.1159/000494458
Q2 JournalSJR: 0.4h-index: 20
Strong EvidenceRandomized Controlled Trialn=80 participants

In Plain Language: lower back pain, explained

Subacute low back pain is a frequent problem with the danger of chronification. Conventional treatment options are not always effective. Power Point therapy (PPT) is a novel approach that uses reflexological insights and can be easily applied by practitioners and patients. Randomized, active controlled study comparing 10 units of PPT of 10 min each, with 10 units of standard physiotherapy of 30 min each. Outcomes were functional scores (Roland Morris Disability, Oswestry, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Linton-Halldén - primary outcome) and health-related quality of life (SF-36), as well as blinded assessments by clinicians (secondary outcome). Eighty patients consented and were randomized, 41 to PPT, 39 to physiotherapy. Measurements were taken at baseline, after the first and after the last treatment (approximately 5 weeks after enrolment). Multivariate linear models of covariance showed significant effects of time and group (p < 0.001) and for the quality of life variables also a significant interaction of time by group (p < 0.001). Clinician-documented variables showed significant differences at follow-up (p = 0.05 to p < 0.0001). Both physiotherapy and PPT improve subacute low back pain significantly. PPT is likely more effective and should be studied further. Hintergrund: Subakute Rückenschmerzen sind häufig und werden oft chronisch. Konventionelle Behandlungen sind nicht immer erfolgreich. Power Point Therapie (PPT) ist eine neue Therapieform, die auf Einsichten der Reflexzonentherapie beruht und durch Behandler und Patienten leicht anwendbar ist. Methode: Randomi­sierte, klinische, pragmatische Studie, in der 10 Einheiten PPT mit je 10 Min Dauer mit 10 Einheiten leitlinienbasier­ter Physiotherapie mit je 30 Minuten Dauer verglichen wurden. Zielkrietieren waren die Funktion (Roland Morris Disability, Oswestry, McGill Pain, Linton-Halldén/Orebrö als Hauptkriterien) und die gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität (SF-36) und ve

Key Findings: what this randomised trial found about lower back pain

  • ✓Power Point Therapy (PPT), a reflexology-based treatment, produced significant improvements in subacute low back pain outcomes compared to standard physiotherapy (p < 0.001).
  • ✓PPT required only 10 minutes per session compared to 30 minutes for standard physiotherapy while achieving comparable or superior functional and quality of life improvements.
  • ✓Both time effects and group differences were statistically significant across multiple outcome measures including Roland Morris Disability, Oswestry, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36 quality of life assessments.

What This Means for You

If you have subacute back pain, this research suggests PPT may be worth trying as it showed promise in reducing pain and improving quality of life, though more research is needed to confirm these findings.

What This Means for Practitioners

PPT demonstrates comparable or superior outcomes to standard physiotherapy in shorter treatment times, making it potentially more efficient for managing subacute back pain in your practice.

Study Design: how this randomised trial was run

Sample Size
80 participants
Read Full Paper↗

Lower back pain: common questions

What does this study say about lower back pain?

If you have subacute back pain, this research suggests PPT may be worth trying as it showed promise in reducing pain and improving quality of life, though more research is needed to confirm these findings.

What did this study find?

Power Point Therapy (PPT), a reflexology-based treatment, produced significant improvements in subacute low back pain outcomes compared to standard physiotherapy (p < 0.001). PPT required only 10 minutes per session compared to 30 minutes for standard physiotherapy while achieving comparable or superior functional and quality of life improvements. Both time effects and group differences were statistically significant across multiple outcome measures including Roland Morris Disability, Oswestry, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and SF-36 quality of life assessments.

How strong is this evidence?

This is a randomised trial and we rate its evidence strong. It covers 80 participants. It was published in Complementary medicine research, a Q2 journal. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Related Research

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist