Skip to main content

The use of complementary and alternative medicine by irish pediatric cancer patients

Authors: O'Connor Niamh, Graham Donna, O'Meara Anne, Devins Mary, Jennings Valerie, O'Leary Denise, O'Reilly MaeveJournal: Journal of pediatric hematology/oncologyPublished: October 1, 2013DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31829f408a
Limited EvidenceCross Sectionaln=92 participants

In Plain Language: cancer pain, explained

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the Irish pediatric cancer setting has not previously been established. To investigate the prevalence and predictors of CAM use in this group of patients, an anonymous cross-sectional survey was offered to all carers of patients either on or off treatment for malignancy at a single pediatric cancer center over an 8-week period. Of a total of 220 questionnaires distributed, 98 (43%) were returned. Six were excluded because of inadequate data. A total of 58% of children were male and the mean age was 9 years. The most common cancer diagnosis was leukemia (45%). Fifty-two respondents (57%) said their child had used or was using CAM, and 55% of whom had started since their cancer diagnosis. The most common types of CAM used were vitamins and minerals (18%), reflexology (11%), dietary supplements (11%), faith healers (9%), and energy therapies (9%). The most common reason for CAM use was to improve physical well-being (31%). A total of 65% of CAM users had not told their doctor that they were doing so. Of the 52 CAM users, 30 (58%) were using oral CAM medication. A total of 86% of CAM users reported benefit from the treatment, and no respondent reported side effects.There was no significant relationship between sex, tumor type, age, income, previous treatment, and CAM use. Where parents had a higher level of education, children were more likely to use CAM (P=0.035.) There was a statistically significant relationship between respondents rating of conventional therapy and CAM use (P=0.007). Interestingly, parents who were satisfied with conventional therapy were more likely to use CAM. The high prevalence of CAM use demonstrated in this study and particularly the high use of CAM medication therapies underlines the importance of physicians asking routinely about CAM use in this population.

Key Findings: what this cross-sectional study found about cancer pain

  • ✓Fifty-seven percent of Irish pediatric cancer patients used complementary and alternative medicine, with 55% of these users starting CAM after their cancer diagnosis.
  • ✓The most common types of CAM used by pediatric cancer patients were vitamins and minerals (18%), reflexology (11%), and dietary supplements (11%).
  • ✓Improving physical well-being was the most common reason cited by caregivers for using CAM in their children with cancer (31%).

What This Means for You

While this survey found that reflexology was used by some families of cancer patients and reported as beneficial, the evidence is limited because it's based on family reports without a comparison group, so we cannot be certain reflexology caused the improvements.

What This Means for Practitioners

Reflexology was among the top five CAM therapies chosen by families of pediatric cancer patients in this study, but practitioners should be aware that 65% of users did not inform their doctors, highlighting the importance of encouraging communication with medical teams.

Study Design: how this cross-sectional study was run

Sample Size
92 participants
Read Full Paper↗

Cancer pain: common questions

What does this study say about cancer pain?

While this survey found that reflexology was used by some families of cancer patients and reported as beneficial, the evidence is limited because it's based on family reports without a comparison group, so we cannot be certain reflexology caused the improvements.

What did this study find?

Fifty-seven percent of Irish pediatric cancer patients used complementary and alternative medicine, with 55% of these users starting CAM after their cancer diagnosis. The most common types of CAM used by pediatric cancer patients were vitamins and minerals (18%), reflexology (11%), and dietary supplements (11%). Improving physical well-being was the most common reason cited by caregivers for using CAM in their children with cancer (31%).

How strong is this evidence?

This is a cross-sectional study and we rate its evidence limited. It covers 92 participants. It was published in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. This study is indexed here for context; it did not test reflexology itself.

Related Research

Looking for a reflexologist?

Find practitioners who can help with the conditions studied in this research.

Find a Reflexologist